for people still doubting michael jackson was a pedophile
•26 June, 2009 • Leave a CommentSubject: Re: YOU FUCKING PEOPLE KILLED HIM
From: Hell Toupee
Newsgroups: alt.music.michael-jackson, alt.slack, alt.fan.howard-stern
Followup-To: alt.gossip.celebrities
Michael Jackson will live forever wrote:
>
> Michael Jackson was a god among artists. Check his videos on YouTube;
> ALL OF THEM ARE FUCKING AWESOME. Stupid cunts like you who spent their
> lives criticizing him are the reason he’s dead.
>
> HOPE YOUR HAPPY.
Happy? Try thrilled!
This is only a partial list of what was found in the Neverland search.
I emphasize that: a partial list.
I’ve summarized the official descriptions of these pieces of evidence,
hence the numerous elipses.
A few points of interest to note:
1. Contrary to the f’loons claims, a number of nudie male materials
were found. Remember, this is just part of the list, it doesn’t
include, for instance, some of the nude guy materials we already know
about.
2. MJ had Macauley’s photo in his _bathroom_. Where a lot of his porn
was found (plus some bottles of booze not included in this particular
list). This, f’loons, is the bathroom used by the boys who spent time
in MJ’s bedroom.
3. The cops retrieved a couple of bags containing, among other things,
bloody bedsheets and nine pairs of men’s underwear from the *library
area of the upstairs video/arcade room*!
4. This partial list goes far to illustrate how Neverland was _loaded_
with porn. They found it everywhere. Note that most of it was freely
available to kids. Very little was locked up.
5. Check out the drug stuff. It’s well known that MJ has a substance
abuse problem, and that he’s hooked on Xanax. Look at all the
prescriptions found in other people’s names. Note that his bestest,
most favorite DERMATOLOGIST buddy doctor – Dr. Arnold Klein – wrote a
prescription for Xanax for MJ’s dear friend Frank Tyson, which was
found in MJ’s possession. What’s a dermatologist doing writing a scrip
for mood-altering drug?
Also note that a Las Vegas physician wrote two other scrips for Xanax,
*neither* of which were in MJ’s name, but both of which were found in
his possession.
And Dr. Klein wrote another prescription for another person whose
given address was actually that of a television production company!
Plus the syringe. Plus the ‘unidentified substance’ which was sent off
to the state lab for testing.
Plus the letter from MJ’s physician about detox programs.
Put it all together and what do you get?
Here we go:
Item number 301…five DVD media covers…the covers indicated the
contents were films from the Hustler ‘Barely Legal’ series…
…Item number 302 was described as a pornographic magazine located
within the master bathroom at the Neverland Ranch residence. …I
found it to be a periodical entitled, ‘The Best of Club’…
…Item number 303..three books that contained nude photographs, found
in the master bedroom within the Neverland Ranch… …the first book
was… titled Scenes D’Interieur…The book consisted of a compilation
of photographs of nude and/or semi-nude women, in sexually explicit
poses.
…The second book was…Camp Cove – Photos Sydney Men… the book was
a compilation of naked and semi-naked men…
…The third book was…titled Dressup: Playacts and Fantasies of
Childhood. …This book appeared to be a compilation of photographs
that appeared to depict either pre-teen or early teen age individuals.
Some of the pictured children were nude and/or semi-nude.
…Item Number 304. This item was described as being two pornographic
magazines and two nude art books found in the master bathroom at the
Neverland Ranch. …The Gynoids appeared to have a fetish
(bondage, sadomasochism, piercings, etc.) related theme.
…Item number 305…a photograph of Macauley Culkin, which was
located in the master bathroom…
…Item number 306…a pornographic magazine located within a metal
brief case in the master bathroom…
…Item number 307…a book, which contained nude photographs of
men…found in the master bathroom…titled Bidgood…a compilation of
photographs of nude and semi-nude men.
…Item Number 309…a black leather bag, which contained pornographic
magazines and pornographic DVDs.
…Within a separate compartment within this front portion of the
briefcase…a 5cc syringe (no needle).
…On the reverse side of the briefcase was a compartment that
contained miscellaneous loose papers and envelopes.
…There was a postcard depicting young boys (clothed) lined up at a
urinal.
…The main compartment contained miscellaneous paperwork,
pornographic periodicals…and two DVD cases that appeared to contain
pornographic material…the first DVD was titled Michael Ryan’s
Believe It Or Not…the second DVD was titled Sloppy Dogs Presents:
Fuck Me, I’m A Bad Girl.
…a letter from a student Councilor/Teacher…wrote of a desire to
bring a group of children to California for the purposes of meeting
with Michael Jackson.
…a greeting card from Erma J. Lardydell…the writer indicated she
sang with Michael Jackson and provided the name of her son, Prince
Alba, who was thirteen years of age…
…The final items within this compartment were the May 2002 issue of
Gallery and the September 2002 issue of Gallery.
Item Number 313…a book that contained nude photographs. This item
was located in the master bathroom…This book was titled Naked As A
Jaybird…some of the pictures depicted sexually explicit activities.
…Item Number 505. This item was described as being three books with
photographs of nude and partially clothed children. This item was
found in the downstairs cellar area of the video/arcade area.
Item number 508…a book depicting nude children…titled The Fourth
Sex, Adolescent Extremes…some of the pictures depicted individuals
wearing no clothing, or in a state of partial dress…
Item Number 509…a book…titled Cronos…the book appeared to be a
compilation of numerous photographs depicting men, women, and children
of both sexes…the majority of the photographs depicted the subjects
completely unclothed, including the male and female children…
…Item Number 510…two bags of miscellaneous underclothes and
bloodied bed linen…located in the upstairs library room of the
video/arcade area. The Disneyland bag contained a red Prada brand,
long-sleeve shirt…I also found the bag to contain a white cotton
sheet with reddish brown stains on it, which I believed were
consistent with blood staining. The Garden City Hotel bag had a white
Harbor Bay long-sleeved cotton shirt; a folded cotton bed sheet…and
numerous pairs of size 30 cotton briefs…in total, there were nine
pair of men’s cotton brief underwear. Some of the briefs had
discolorations and/or stains, but all pairs appeared to have been
washed.
Item number 514…the glass vial…seemed to contain remnants of a
substance…submitted to the California…Crime Laboratory…
Item Number 515…medicine bottles, found in the upstairs library room
of the video arcade area…four prescription bottles…
…the first bottle indicated the prescription was prescribed to a
subject named Michael Armstrong…the prescription was for Percocet…
…the second bottle…to Peter Midani…it should be noted this
address was also associated with a
Grace Rwarambu (the nanny) …the location is actually a television
production company…prescribing physician was a Dr. Klein…contained
Prednisone…
…third bottle prescribed to ‘M.M.’…contents were…’Erytab’…
…fourth bottle indicated the intended recipient of the prescription
was Frank Tyson…Dr. Arnold Klein…Beverly Hills…prescribed this
medication…The prescription was for Alprazolam …
Item Number 518…prescription paperwork…a prescription for Frank
Tyson…for Alprazolam…prescribing physician was Dr. William
VanValin…a prescription for a Manuel Rivera…for Xanax…the
prescribing physician was a Dr. William VanValin.
Item Number 349…paperwork found within the master bathroom…letter
is addressed to ‘Dearest MJ’…the letter indicated it was from Dr.
Farshchian…The letter pertains to a ‘program’ for outpatient
detoxification…
Item Number 1001…Barely Legal magazine…found in the museum/office
area…
Item number 1002…a magazine, found in the museum/office area…the
December 2002 issue of ‘Naughty Neighbors’…
Item #365…two hardbound books…’Robert Maxwell Photographs’…’The
Christy Report Exploring The Outer Edges of the Sexual Experience’…
Item Number 366…several books and magazines…located within the
master bedroom/den area…
…five copies of ‘The Nudist’…contained nude photographs of men,
women, and children…
…19 copies of ‘The Nudist, Sunshine and Health’…contained
photographs of nude men, women, and children…
…one magazine titled ‘Solair Universelle Day Nudisme’…contained
photographs of nude men, women, and children…
…a magazine titled ‘American Sunbather’…contained photographs of
nude men, women, and children…
…three issues of ‘Eden’…contained photographs of nude men, women,
and children…
…a softcover book…titled Man, a Sexual Study of Man…depicted
naked males engaged in sexually explicit activities including oral
copulation and anal sex…
…a softcover book…titled Taormina Wilhelm Von Gloeden…a
compilation of photographs, which depicted both adult and juvenile
males, who were posed in the nude…
…a softcover book…titled The Golden Age Of Neglect…the sexual
behavior depicted in this book contained photography which depicted
both male and female subjects, in various stages of undress, including
full nudity. Some of the photographs depicted sexually explicit
activity, including oral sex, masturbation, and digital
penetration…the subjects appear to be within the age range of late
adolescence to early adults…
… hard cover book…titled Before the Hand of Man…a compilation
of photographs which depict nude males…
hard cover book…titled Bob and Rod…a compilation of
photographs of two adult males, who for the most part, were pictured
in full and partial nudity…
MJ once wrote a note to his late sister-in-law:
“Dee Dee Please read this article about child malestation [sic] and
please read it to Taj, T.S. and Tarryl [her children]. It brings out
how even your own reletives [sic] can be malesters [sic] of children,
or
even uncle or aunts malesting [sic] nephew or nieces. Please read.”
http://www.courttv.com/news/jackson/photo_gallery2/17.html
========
========
========
Subject: Re: Payoff list?
From: Hell Toupee
Newsgroups: alt.music.michael-jackson, alt.gossip.celebrities
Podkayne Fries wrote:
>
> How many kids did Pervo Pan pay off?
That we know of.
Definite payoffs:
Jordy Chandler, Jason Francia. Know for sure despite the
confidentiality clauses in the settlements because they came out in
MJ’s molestion trial, since Francia testified for the prosecution and
Jordy was asked by the prosecution to be a witness.
The following are unconfirmed but highly suspicious, due to the
pattern shown in each relationship with MJ. MJ typically had brief and
intense relationships with chosen boys, where they spent considerable
time with MJ, shared his bed, traveled the world with him, and were
usually introduced as his ’son’ or ‘cousin’. MJ paid these boys and
their families huge amounts of cash and favors (including jobs,
jewelry, expensive cars, immigration assistance, recording contracts,
expensive gear and paying for lessons). In some cases the financial
remuneration continued for years following the end of the
relationships:
Jimmy Safechuck, Wade Robson, Brett Barnes, Frank Cascio and his
little brothers, Mac Culkin, that German boy whose parents refuse to
talk about it, Brandon Adams, at least one of MJ’s nephews.
Other boys of interest, due to their similarly intense relationships
with MJ: Corey Feldman, Ahmad Elatab, Emmanuel Lewis.
This list does not include the two boys who came forward about MJ
having had sexually explicit phone conversations with each of them -
Terry George, and that nine-year-old kid from Utah. Neither one was
known to have spend any amount of time in MJ’s company.
HellT
l’alchimie pour les nuls
•25 June, 2009 • Leave a Commenthttp://www.ustream.tv/recorded/1661506
patrick burensteinas, radio ici et maintenant, 12 juin 2009
Yet another outstanding interview of that master alchemist:)
Enjoy the oral alchemical tradition.
the harm principle
•21 June, 2009 • Leave a Commenthttp://www.davidhildebrand.org/teaching/handouts/mill.php
John Stuart Mill and The Harm Principle
In On Liberty, John Stuart Mill puts forth a famous liberty limiting principle that has come to be known as “the Harm Principle” (HP, henceforth). This principle is probably the most permissive of the liberty limiting principles. It says, in extended form:
…the sole end for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively, in interfering with the liberty of action of any of their number, is self-protection. That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilised community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either physical or moral, is not sufficient warrant. He cannot rightfully be compelled to do or forbear because it will be better for him to do so, because it will make him happier, because, in the opinion of others, to do so would be wise, or even right…The only part of the conduct of anyone, for which he is amenable to society, is that which concerns others. In the part which merely concerns himself, his independence is, of right, absolute. Over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign.
An important distinction: Self-regarding vs. other-regarding actions. Self regarding actions are those which affect only the agent himself. Other-regarding actions affect others.
Limitations: For the HP to apply, the agent in question must be an adult, fully in control of his or her faculties.
A true agent of an action is one who, with respect to that action, is: 1. Free (not coerced) 2. Voluntary (competent to choose) and 3. Informed (has sufficient information to choose)
Example: crossing an unsafe bridge.
But, aren’t others always affected? Perhaps, but in order for an action to be other-regarding, it must: 1. violate a distinct and assignable (specific) obligation; or 2. render the agent incapable of performing a specific duty to others. So, in sum, we may restrict an act by law if it violates someone’s rights. Otherwise, it may be punished at most by opinion.
Given Mill’s definition of an agent, three kinds of paternalistic laws might be justifiable. Namely, those which restrict acts involving:
1. Coercion (e.g., incest, minimum wage laws, usury) 2. Involuntariness (e.g., laws restricting addictive drugs, confinement of the mentally ill) 3. Ignorance (professional licensing, prescription drug laws, vaccinations)
William T. Myers, Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Birmingham-Southern College
the crisis of credit visualized
•12 June, 2009 • Leave a Commental qaeda doesn’t exist
•1 June, 2009 • Leave a CommentThings we understood in the week(s) after 911, yet many still haven’t figured out up to today… so it bears a reminder :
still
BARACKHNATEN : obama family clones of akhenaten family
•11 May, 2009 • Leave a Comment
“President Barack Obama looks amazingly like Akhenaten the father of monotheism. Michelle Obama looks amazingly like Akhenaten’s mother, Queen Tiye.
Akhenaten had two daughters by Nefertiti They look amazingly like Malia and Sasha.
The code names of Renegade, Renaissance, Radiance and Rosebud correlate well with the ancient depiction of the Royal Family.
Are the First Family clones?”
The Marijuana Conspiracy – The Real Reason Hemp is Illegal
•2 May, 2009 • Leave a Commentby Doug Yurchey, June 18, 2005
THE REAL REASON CANNABIS HAS BEEN OUTLAWED HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ITS EFFECTS ON THE MIND AND BODY.
MARIJUANA is DANGEROUS. Pot is NOT harmful to the human body or mind. Marijuana does NOT pose a threat to the general public. Marijuana is very much a danger to the oil companies, alcohol, tobacco industries and a large number of chemical corporations. Various big businesses, with plenty of dollars and influence, have suppressed the truth from the people.
The truth is if marijuana was utilized for its vast array of commercial products, it would create an industrial atomic bomb! Entrepreneurs have not been educated on the product potential of pot. The super rich have conspired to spread misinformation about an extremely versatile plant that, if used properly, would ruin their companies.
Where did the word ‘marijuana’ come from? In the mid 1930s, the M-word was created to tarnish the good image and phenomenal history of the hemp plant…as you will read. The facts cited here, with references, are generally verifiable in the Encyclopedia Britannica which was printed on hemp paper for 150 years:
* All schoolbooks were made from hemp or flax paper until the 1880s (Hemp Paper Reconsidered, Jack Frazier, 1974).
* It was LEGAL TO PAY TAXES WITH HEMP in America from 1631 until the early 1800s (LA Times, Aug. 12, 1981).
* REFUSING TO GROW HEMP in America during the 17th and 18th Centuries WAS AGAINST THE LAW! You could be jailed in Virginia for refusing to grow hemp from 1763 to 1769 (Hemp in Colonial Virginia, G. M. Herdon).
* George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and other founding fathers GREW Hemp (Washington and Jefferson Diaries).
* Jefferson smuggled hemp seeds from China to France then to America.
* Benjamin Franklin owned one of the first paper mills in America and it processed hemp.
* Also, the War of 1812 was fought over hemp. Napoleon wanted to cut off Moscow’s export to England (Emperor Wears No Clothes, Jack Herer).
* For thousands of years, 90% of all ships’ sails and rope were made from hemp.
* The word ‘canvas’ is Dutch for cannabis (Webster’s New World Dictionary).
* 80% of all textiles, fabrics, clothes, linen, drapes, bed sheets, etc. were made from hemp until the 1820s with the introduction of the cotton gin.
* The first Bibles, maps, charts, Betsy Ross’s flag, the first drafts of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were made from hemp (U.S. Government Archives).
* The first crop grown in many states was hemp. 1850 was a peak year for Kentucky producing 40,000 tons. Hemp was the largest cash crop until the 20th Century; State Archives.
* Oldest known records of hemp farming go back 5000 years in China, although hemp industrialization probably goes back to ancient Egypt.
* Rembrants, Gainsboroughs, Van Goghs as well as most early canvas paintings were principally painted on hemp linen.
* In 1916, the U.S. Government predicted that by the 1940s all paper would come from hemp and that no more trees need to be cut down. Government studies report that 1 acre of hemp equals 4.1 acres of trees. Plans were in the works to implement such programs; Department of Agriculture
* Quality paints and varnishes were made from hemp seed oil until 1937. 58,000 tons of hemp seeds were used in America for paint products in 1935; Sherman Williams Paint Co. testimony before Congress against the 1937 Marijuana Tax Act.
* Henry Ford’s first Model-T was built to run on hemp gasoline and the CAR ITSELF WAS CONTRUCTED FROM HEMP! On his large estate, Ford was photographed among his hemp fields. The car, ‘grown from the soil,’ had hemp plastic panels whose impact strength was 10 times stronger than steel; Popular Mechanics, 1941.
* Hemp called ‘Billion Dollar Crop.’ It was the first time a cash crop had a business potential to exceed a billion dollars (Popular Mechanics, Feb., 1938).
* Mechanical Engineering Magazine (Feb. 1938) published an article entitled ‘The Most Profitable and Desirable Crop that Can be Grown.’ It stated that if hemp was cultivated using 20th Century technology, it would be the single largest agricultural crop in the U.S. and the rest of the world. The following information comes directly from the United States Department of Agriculture’s 1942 14-minute film encouraging and instructing ‘patriotic American farmers’ to grow 350,000 acres of hemp each year for the war effort:
‘…(When) Grecian temples were new, hemp was already old in the service of mankind. For thousands of years, even then, this plant had been grown for cordage and cloth in China and elsewhere in the East. For centuries prior to about 1850, all the ships that sailed the western seas were rigged with hempen rope and sails. For the sailor, no less than the hangman, hemp was indispensable…
…Now with Philippine and East Indian sources of hemp in the hands of the Japanese…American hemp must meet the needs of our Army and Navy as well as of our industries…
…the Navy’s rapidly dwindling reserves. When that is gone, American hemp will go on duty again; hemp for mooring ships; hemp for tow lines; hemp for tackle and gear; hemp for countless naval uses both on ship and shore. Just as in the days when Old Ironsides sailed the seas victorious with her hempen shrouds and hempen sails. Hemp for victory!’
Certified proof from the Library of Congress; found by the research of Jack Herer, refuting claims of other government agencies that the 1942 USDA film ‘Hemp for Victory’ did not exist. Hemp cultivation and production do not harm the environment. The USDA Bulletin #404 concluded that hemp produces 4 times as much pulp with at least 4 to 7 times less pollution. From Popular Mechanics, Feb. 1938:
‘It has a short growing season…It can be grown in any state…The long roots penetrate and break the soil to leave it in perfect condition for the next year’s crop. The dense shock of leaves, 8 to 12 feet above the ground, chokes out weeds.
…hemp, this new crop can add immeasurably to American agriculture and industry.’
In the 1930s, innovations in farm machinery would have caused an industrial revolution when applied to hemp. This single resource could have created millions of new jobs generating thousands of quality products. Hemp, if not made illegal, would have brought America out of the Great Depression.
William Randolph Hearst (Citizen Kane) and the Hearst Paper Manufacturing Division of Kimberly Clark owned vast acreage of timberlands. The Hearst Company supplied most paper products. Patty Hearst’s grandfather, a destroyer of nature for his own personal profit, stood to lose billions because of hemp.
In 1937, Dupont patented the processes to make plastics from oil and coal. Dupont’s Annual Report urged stockholders to invest in its new petrochemical division. Synthetics such as plastics, cellophane, celluloid, methanol, nylon, rayon, Dacron, etc., could now be made from oil. Natural hemp industrialization would have ruined over 80% of Dupont’s business.
THE CONSPIRACY
Andrew Mellon became Hoover’s Secretary of the Treasury and Dupont’s primary investor. He appointed his future nephew-in-law, Harry J. Anslinger, to head the Federal Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs.
Secret meetings were held by these financial tycoons. Hemp was declared dangerous and a threat to their billion dollar enterprises. For their dynasties to remain intact, hemp had to go. These men took an obscure Mexican slang word: ‘marihuana’ and pushed it into the consciousness of America.
MEDIA MANIPULATION
A media blitz of ‘yellow journalism’ raged in the late 1920s and 1930s. Hearst’s newspapers ran stories emphasizing the horrors of marihuana. The menace of marihuana made headlines. Readers learned that it was responsible for everything from car accidents to loose morality.
Films like ‘Reefer Madness’ (1936), ‘Marihuana: Assassin of Youth’ (1935) and ‘Marihuana: The Devil’s Weed’ (1936) were propaganda designed by these industrialists to create an enemy. Their purpose was to gain public support so that anti-marihuana laws could be passed.
Examine the following quotes from ‘The Burning Question’ aka REEFER MADNESS:
* A violent narcotic.
* Acts of shocking violence.
* Incurable insanity.
* Soul-destroying effects.
* Under the influence of the drug he killed his entire family with an ax.
* More vicious, more deadly even than these soul-destroying drugs (heroin, cocaine) is the menace of marihuana!
Reefer Madness did not end with the usual ‘The End.’ The film concluded with these words plastered on the screen: TELL YOUR CHILDREN.
In the 1930s, people were very naive; even to the point of ignorance. The masses were like sheep waiting to be led by the few in power. They did not challenge authority. If the news was in print or on the radio, they believed it had to be true. They told their children and their children grew up to be the parents of the baby-boomers
On April 14, 1937, the Prohibitive Marihuana Tax Law or the bill that outlawed hemp was directly brought to the House Ways and Means Committee. This committee is the only one that can introduce a bill to the House floor without it being debated by other committees. The Chairman of the Ways and Means, Robert Doughton, was a Dupont supporter. He insured that the bill would pass Congress.
Dr. James Woodward, a physician and attorney, testified too late on behalf of the American Medical Association. He told the committee that the reason the AMA had not denounced the Marihuana Tax Law sooner was that the Association had just discovered that marihuana was hemp.
Few people, at the time, realized that the deadly menace they had been reading about on Hearst’s front pages was in fact passive hemp. The AMA understood cannabis to be a MEDICINE found in numerous healing products sold over the last hundred years.
In September of 1937, hemp became illegal. The most useful crop known became a drug and our planet has been suffering ever since. Congress banned hemp because it was said to be the most violence causing drug known. Anslinger, head of the Drug Commission for 31 years, promoted the idea that marihuana made users act extremely violent. In the 1950s, under the Communist threat of McCarthyism, Anslinger now said the exact opposite. Marijuana will pacify you so much that soldiers would not want to fight.
Today, our planet is in desperate trouble. Earth is suffocating as large tracts of rain forests disappear. Pollution, poisons and chemicals are killing people. These great problems could be reversed if we industrialized hemp. Natural biomass could provide all of the planet’s energy needs that are currently supplied by fossil fuels. We have consumed 80% of our oil and gas reserves. We need a renewable resource. Hemp could be the solution to soaring gas prices.
THE WONDER PLANT
Hemp has a higher quality fiber than wood fiber. Far fewer caustic chemicals are required to make paper from hemp than from trees. Hemp paper does not turn yellow and is very durable. The plant grows quickly to maturity in a season where trees take a lifetime.
ALL PLASTIC PRODUCTS SHOULD BE MADE FROM HEMP SEED OIL. Hempen plastics are biodegradable! Over time, they would break down and not harm the environment. Oil-based plastics, the ones we are very familiar with, help ruin nature; they do not break down and will do great harm in the future. The process to produce the vast array of natural (hempen) plastics will not ruin the rivers as Dupont and other petrochemical companies have done. Ecology does not fit in with the plans of the Oil Industry and the political machine. Hemp products are safe and natural.
MEDICINES SHOULD BE MADE FROM HEMP. We should go back to the days when the AMA supported cannabis cures. ‘Medical Marijuana’ is given out legally to only a handful of people while the rest of us are forced into a system that relies on chemicals. Pot is only healthy for the human body.
WORLD HUNGER COULD END. A large variety of food products can be generated from hemp. The seeds contain one of the highest sources of protein in nature. ALSO: They have two essential fatty acids that clean your body of cholesterol. These essential fatty acids are not found anywhere else in nature! Consuming pot seeds is the best thing you could do for your body. Eat uncooked hemp seeds.
CLOTHES SHOULD BE MADE FROM HEMP. Hemp clothing is extremely strong and durable over time. You could hand clothing, made from pot, down to your grandchildren. Today, there are American companies that make hemp clothing; usually 50% hemp. Hemp fabrics should be everywhere. Instead, they are almost underground. Superior hemp products are not allowed to advertise on fascist television. Kentucky, once the top hemp producing state, made it ILLEGAL TO WEAR hemp clothing! Can you imagine being thrown into jail for wearing quality jeans?
The world is crazy… but that does not mean you have to join the insanity. Get together. Spread the news. Tell people, and that includes your children, the truth. Use hemp products. Eliminate the word ‘marijuana’. Realize the history that created it. Make it politically incorrect to say or print the M-word. Fight against the propaganda (designed to favor the agenda of the super rich) and the bullshit. Hemp must be utilized in the future. We need a clean energy source to save our planet. INDUSTRIALIZE HEMP!
The liquor, tobacco and oil companies fund more than a million dollars a day to Partnership for a Drug-Free America and other similar agencies. We have all seen their commercials. Now, their motto is: ‘It’s more dangerous than we thought’. Lies from the powerful corporations, that began with Hearst, are still alive and well today.
The brainwashing continues. Now, the commercials say: If you buy a joint, you contribute to murders and gang wars. The latest anti-pot commercials say: If you buy a joint… you are promoting TERRORISM! The new enemy (terrorism) has paved the road to brainwash you any way THEY see fit.
There is only one enemy; the friendly people you pay your taxes to; the war-makers and nature destroyers. With your funding, they are killing the world right in front of your eyes. HALF A MILLION DEATHS EACH YEAR ARE CAUSED BY TOBACCO. HALF A MILLION DEATHS EACH YEAR ARE CAUSED BY ALCOHOL. NO ONE HAS EVER, EVER DIED FROM SMOKING POT!! In the entire history of the human race, not one death can be attributed to cannabis. Our society has outlawed grass but condones the use of the KILLERS: TOBACCO and ALCOHOL. Hemp should be declassified and placed in DRUG stores to relieve stress. Hardening and constriction of the arteries are bad; but hemp usage actually enlarges the arteries…which is a healthy condition. We have been so conditioned to think that: Smoking is harmful. That is NOT the case for passive pot. Ingesting THC, hemp’s active agent, has a positive effect; relieving asthma and glaucoma. A joint tends to alleviate the nausea caused by chemotherapy. You are able to eat on hemp. This is a healthy state of being.
(One personal note: During the pregnancy of my wife, she was having some difficulty gaining weight. We were in the hospital. A nurse called us to one side and said: ‘Off the record, if you smoke pot…you’d get something called the munchies and you’ll gain weight.’ I swear that is a true story).
The stereotype for a pothead is similar to a drunk, bubble-brain. Yet, the truth is one’s creative abilities can be enhanced under its influence. The perception of time slightly slows and one can become more sensitive. You can more appreciate all arts; be closer to nature and generally FEEL more under the influence of cannabis. It is, in fact, the exact opposite state of mind and body as the drunken state. You can be more aware with pot.
The pot plant is an ALIEN plant. There is physical evidence that cannabis is not like any other plant on this planet. One could conclude that it was brought here for the benefit of humanity. Hemp is the ONLY plant where the males appear one way and the females appear very different, physically! No one ever speaks of males and females in regard to the plant kingdom because plants do not show their sexes; except for cannabis. To determine what sex a certain, normal, Earthly plant is: You have to look internally, at its DNA. A male blade of grass (physically) looks exactly like a female blade of grass. The hemp plant has an intense sexuallity. Growers know to kill the males before they fertilize the females. Yes, folks… The most potent pot comes from ‘horny females.’
The reason this amazing, very sophisticated, ET plant from the future is illegal has nothing to do with how it physically affects us…
… POT IS ILLEGAL BECAUSE BILLIONAIRES WANT TO REMAIN BILLIONAIRES!
PS: I think the word ‘DRUGS’ should not be used as an umbrellaword that covers all chemical agents. Drugs have come to be known as something BAD. Are you aware there are LEGAL drugstores?! Yep, in every city. Unbelievable. Each so-called drug should be considered individually. Cannabis is a medicine and not a drug. We should DARE to speak the TRUTH no matter what the law is.
birth of the hippie movement : a CIA-military operation
•30 April, 2009 • 1 CommentBY DAVID MCGOWAN, MAY 08, 2008
“(…) By April 1965, fully 25,000 uniformed American kids, most still teenagers barely out of high school, will be slogging through the rice paddies of Vietnam. By the end of the year, U.S. troop strength will have surged to 200,000.
Meanwhile, elsewhere in the world in those early months of 1965, a new ‘scene’ is just beginning to take shape in the city of Los Angeles. In a geographically and socially isolated community known as Laurel Canyon – a heavily wooded, rustic, serene, yet vaguely ominous slice of LA nestled in the hills that separate the Los Angeles basin from the San Fernando Valley – musicians, singers and songwriters suddenly begin to gather as though summoned there by some unseen Pied Piper. Within months, the ‘hippie/flower child’ movement will be given birth there, along with the new style of music that will provide the soundtrack for the tumultuous second half of the 1960s.
An uncanny number of rock music superstars will emerge from Laurel Canyon beginning in the mid-1960s and carrying through the decade of the 1970s. The first to drop an album will be The Byrds, whose biggest star will prove to be David Crosby. The band’s debut effort, “Mr. Tambourine Man,” will be released on the Summer Solstice of 1965. It will quickly be followed by releases from the John Phillips-led Mamas and the Papas (“If You Can Believe Your Eyes and Ears,” January 1966), Love with Arthur Lee (“Love,” May 1966), Frank Zappa and The Mothers of Invention (“Freak Out,” June 1966), Buffalo Springfield, featuring Stephen Stills and Neil Young (“Buffalo Springfield,” October 1966), and The Doors (“The Doors,” January 1967).
One of the earliest on the Laurel Canyon/Sunset Strip scene is Jim Morrison, the enigmatic lead singer of The Doors. Jim will quickly become one of the most iconic, controversial, critically acclaimed, and influential figures to take up residence in Laurel Canyon. Curiously enough though, the self-proclaimed “Lizard King” has another claim to fame as well, albeit one that none of his numerous chroniclers will feel is of much relevance to his career and possible untimely death: he is the son, as it turns out, of the aforementioned Admiral George Stephen Morrison.
And so it is that, even while the father is actively conspiring to fabricate an incident that will be used to massively accelerate an illegal war, the son is positioning himself to become an icon of the ‘hippie’/anti-war crowd. Nothing unusual about that, I suppose. It is, you know, a small world and all that. And it is not as if Jim Morrison’s story is in any way unique.
During the early years of its heyday, Laurel Canyon’s father figure is the rather eccentric personality known as Frank Zappa. Though he and his various Mothers of Invention line-ups will never attain the commercial success of the band headed by the admiral’s son, Frank will be a hugely influential figure among his contemporaries. Ensconced in an abode dubbed the ‘Log Cabin’ – which sat right in the heart of Laurel Canyon, at the crossroads of Laurel Canyon Boulevard and Lookout Mountain Avenue – Zappa will play host to virtually every musician who passes through the canyon in the mid- to late-1960s. He will also discover and sign numerous acts to his various Laurel Canyon-based record labels. Many of these acts will be rather bizarre and somewhat obscure characters (think Captain Beefheart and Larry “Wild Man” Fischer), but some of them, such as psychedelic rocker cum shock-rocker Alice Cooper, will go on to superstardom.
Zappa, along with certain members of his sizable entourage (the ‘Log Cabin’ was run as an early commune, with numerous hangers-on occupying various rooms in the main house and the guest house, as well as in the peculiar caves and tunnels lacing the grounds of the home; far from the quaint homestead the name seems to imply, by the way, the ‘Log Cabin’ was a cavernous five-level home that featured a 2,000+ square-foot living room with three massive chandeliers and an enormous floor-to-ceiling stone fireplace), will also be instrumental in introducing the look and attitude that will define the ‘hippie’ counterculture (although the Zappa crew preferred the label ‘Freak’). Nevertheless, Zappa (born, curiously enough, on the Winter Solstice of 1940) never really made a secret of the fact that he had nothing but contempt for the ‘hippie’ culture that he helped create and that he surrounded himself with.
Given that Zappa was, by numerous accounts, a rigidly authoritarian control-freak and a supporter of U.S. military actions in Southeast Asia, it is perhaps not surprising that he would not feel a kinship with the youth movement that he helped nurture. And it is probably safe to say that Frank’s dad also had little regard for the youth culture of the 1960s, given that Francis Zappa was, in case you were wondering, a chemical warfare specialist assigned to – where else? – the Edgewood Arsenal. Edgewood is, of course, the longtime home of America’s chemical warfare program, as well as a facility frequently cited as being deeply enmeshed in MK-ULTRA operations. Curiously enough, Frank Zappa literally grew up at the Edgewood Arsenal, having lived the first seven years of his life in military housing on the grounds of the facility. The family later moved to Lancaster, California, near Edwards Air Force Base, where Francis Zappa continued to busy himself with doing classified work for the military/intelligence complex. His son, meanwhile, prepped himself to become an icon of the peace & love crowd. Again, nothing unusual about that, I suppose.
(…)
milton william cooper
•8 April, 2009 • Leave a CommentWilliam Cooper is and will probably remain the best role model for conspiracy whistle-blowers.
This is just a video to introduce him to people who don’t know him.
I got a bunch of his files in my files sites.
I’m slowly uploading his “mystery babylon” series to my second divshare files site.
I bow to Milton William Cooper each time I think of him.
a conversation about race, by craig bodeker
•8 April, 2009 • Leave a Comment
watch it on google:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1084394769627714346
download it from the eMule servers:
ed2k://|file|A.Conversation.About.Race.2008.DOCU.DVDRip.XviD-SPREAD.avi|733263872|A1FD4231147000A586F1F3E72A32EDC9|h=6Y776LVGB56AHOEHVZINVI4JOCAPUCKO|/
When Is It Going To Be Enough, America?
•19 March, 2009 • 7 CommentsI shamelessly stole this piece from Lorie Kramer’s site.
Lorie Kramer
March 15, 2009
Believe it or not, this started being about HR875 & S425, but in the writing of it, it’s just so much more.
This is about the amazing things happening in this nation,
and the inconceivable tolerance the American public has of it all.<
Dear, dear, America,When is it going to be enough? Haven’t you been disrespected, marginalized, misdirected, demeaned, disregarded, ignored, insulted, bullshitted, deliberately misinformed, uninformed, manipulated, controlled, cheated, lied to, poisoned, killed…and generally just plane old screwed for long enough? I’m really starting to wonder about you. Why isn’t all that enough for you America? Yoo Hoo! Are you in there?
How does it make sense that you can be thrown into jail for an unpaid traffic ticket, perhaps for days if it’s on a weekend yet; Bernard Madoff who ruined the lives of thousands gets to hang out in luxury, being available to do whatever one does when they are trying to cover their assets before going to jail? Isn’t that enough for you, America?
You are a number. You are photographed hundreds of times everyday. They intend to track you everywhere, they pretty much already do. They already have your grocery cards, and your cars, and your phones, and your computers. They want to “chip” you, and your animals. You have no privacy. Why isn’t that enough for you, America?
You work, most of you, when you can. Those that don’t work and live off the system just don’t “get it”. Then you pay for their dead weight and their children’s. Hell, you allow yourselves to work a third of the year just to pay taxes! Do you think that’s what our founding fathers had in mind? Is that not enough for you YET, America?
You have worked hard for years, tried to save, invested for the future; only to see your future become a far less comfortable one, if it will be there for you at all. All this because of the legalized gambling known as “the stock market”. All this so that bankers and corporations and politicians can profit, from your losses. And you allow them to throw more and more of your money down the toilet. Your dollar is dying. The domino effect of the situation resulted in a global financial meltdown. Why isn’t THAT enough for you, America?
As the late great Bill Hicks said, “Entertainment is a weapon.” Your “news” is controlled and manufactured. Your comedians are the journalists. You and your children are stupefied and zombified by television. Movies, cars, sports and fashion, and Hallmark holidays; they take your attention and your resources. You are in debt up to your ears. Isn’t that enough for you, America?
Your jobs have already gone overseas or are disappearing daily. Welfare, which used to be an embarrassing thing to partake of, is a way of life for millions. Is that enough for you, America?
Your Constitution might as well not even exist. You allow the marginalizing and silencing of those who would honor it. You call them “possible terrorists”. You watch as they try to deny you your rights. You allow them to ignore our borders and the consequences.
You don’t care enough anymore whether or not the person who “leads” your nation can provide the necessary qualifications to even be considered to run for the office, let alone occupy it. That’s why “they” can slip such schmucks in on you, you make it so easy. Don’t YOU and your children have to throw down your birth certificates for all kinds of things? I thought so. It’s the law. Try and not do it and see what happens. Your current liar in chief didn’t have to do it. Why isn’t THAT enough for you, America?
Then, you are told that you have “no standing” in YOUR own courts to question whether or not these Constitutional requirements have been fulfilled. One or two of you make it part of the way only to be told you WILL NOT BE HEARD, and that’s OK with you! Why isn’t THAT enough for you America? Any of you, and I mean ANY of you has standing to ask this question because it is YOUR Constitution that is OUR LAW.
Should you decide to voice your opinion in disagreement with those in power, you are “allowed” to do so but are penned in cages, or trodden by horses, or beaten or sprayed or tazed. Why isn’t THAT enough for you America?
Your rights have been marginalized; you allow voter fraud to go unchecked. You scream for change but at the next election, you re-elect all but 8 of the 257 about which you complain. Your cities and towns are in disrepair, your infrastructure is crumbling. You devalue your teachers, and reward thieves. You let your schools flounder; therefore many of your children are ignorant (not stupid, there’s a difference). Too many of you are fat, way too many of you are on way too many drugs, legal or not. Your sweeteners cause cancer. You are diseased with mystery illnesses, cancer and HIV/AIDS; and your vaccines are dangerous. Why isn’t all of THAT enough for you, America?
Your families are in shambles. Your children are parents. Divorce is expected. Lying is expected and accepted. Sex is perverted. Morals are old-fashioned. Love is hardly a thing of real value. All this supported by your “media” and “entertainment” industry. Is that still not enough for you, America?
Your fellow Americans have raised valid questions about what actually happened on 9-11. Instead of investigating and insisting on the truth, you demonize them and act as if there could be no possibility of any foul play. There is plenty of evidence that the “official” story is not complete or accurate. You saw with your own eyes how that went down. They continue to lie to you and use the tragedy to further restrict your liberties. Why isn’t THAT enough for you, America?
You are no longer considered one of the good guys in the geopolitical scheme of things. You are hated and reviled for your foreign policy. War profiteering is more important than human life; more important than you and your children’s lives; and those of “the enemy”. Your military and government tortures. Your sons and daughters have died for greed and nation building; and now they want Iran. Why isn’t THAT enough for you, America?
Your drinking water is laced with mind numbing poison. Your cell phones are rotting your brains. You live in an electromagnetic cess pool. Is that enough for you, America?
Your atmosphere, the air you need to breathe, and the waters that you and all other living things on the planet need to live, have been poisoned, often beyond repair; to facilitate military/industrial desires. Why isn’t THAT enough for you, America?
And now, they are after your food, AGAIN. That’s what this started to be about, HR875 & S425. The HR875 bill is in committee in the House with 40, count them, 40 sponsors that will let the government control what you can and cannot do on your own land, with your own crops or livestock, or organic garden. Ixquick it. This bill was introduced by Rosa DeLauro whose husband, Stanley Greenberg, works for Monsanto. This bears repeating. This bill was introduced by Rosa DeLauro whose husband, Stanley Greenberg, works for Monsanto. Do you honestly think this is going to be GOOD for you? Don’t we already have the FDA and the USDA and the FSIS? Why do we need this new agency of control?
Growing one’s own food, local farms, co-ops and ranches are things that do indeed need to be protected. If this global crisis continues, and all indications are that it will; what are you going to do for food if your local growers go away because of government regulation and/or fines and penalties? Remember victory gardens, they used to be a good idea, now they are a threat? It looks to me like what we need to protect our food from is our government. If they finally go after your food, and you’d better know they are, what are you going to do about it? I’ll write more on that and watch it. But, they’ll still try and do it. When they do, which is NOW, will THAT be enough for you, America?
It’s all more than enough for me. Where the hell are you, America?
When is enough going to be enough?
Lorie Kramer
Houston, TX
[snipped email address]
“As stern as it sometimes appears to be, the truth is love and is
never anything but love.”
Vernon Howard
Lorie Kramer has updated the above article on her site :
So, You Want Some Ideas, America?
rampa dico par jacques fortier
•6 March, 2009 • Leave a Commentle site de jacques fortier contient une sorte de dictionnaire (en fait un “glossaire“) des livres de tuesday lobsang rampa. Par ordre alphabétique ce site associe de larges extraits des livres de rampa à certaines notions ésotériques afin de les définir et les illustrer.
j’ai téléchargé ce “rampa dico” et l’ai mis en ligne sur mon second site de fichers (voir plus bas comment décompresser et lire ce fichier) ainsi que sur eMule.
Rampa étant un auteur d’ésotérisme, il s’agit d’un glossaire d’ésotérisme comme en témoignent les titres de ses dix-neuf livres :
* 1 Le troisième œil
* 2 Lama médecin
* 3 Histoire de Rampa
* 4 La caverne des anciens
* 5 Vivre avec le Lama
* 6 Les secrets de l’aura
* 7 Le dictionnaire de Rampa – la sagesse des anciens
* 8 La robe de sagesse
* 9 Les univers secrets
* 10 Les clés du nirvana
* 11 Pour entretenir la flamme
* 12 L’ermite
* 13 La treizième chandelle
* 14 Les lumières de l’astral
* 15 Crépuscule
* 16 C’était ainsi
* 17 Je crois
* 18 Les trois vies
* 19 Le sage du Tibet
Pour consulter son site vous avez donc trois possibilités :
1/ lire directement son site tant qu’il est en ligne ici
2/ télécharger le fichier de son site que j’ai téléchargé grâce à un logiciel aspirateur de site, puis :
a/ soit décompresser ce fichier et créer un répertoire qui contiendra le site, et le lire en commençant pas “index.html”
b/ soit se contenter d’ouvrir winrar en double cliquant sur le fichier “rampa dico” puis double cliquer sur index.html ce qui ouvrira cette page dans votre navigateur et vous permettra le visionnage du reste des pages contenues dans le fichier compressé.
“Comment décompresser et lire le fichier “rampa dico” :
pour l’ensemble de pages web contenues dans le fichier compressé extrait du site de jacques fortier, il faut le logiciel de compression/décompression “winrar”.
on peut le télécharger sur le site de l’éditeur en cliquant sur “French” dans cette page.
“winrar” permet de lire les pages du “rampa dico” sans même décompresser tout le fichier.
il suffit pour ça, une fois qu’on a installé winrar, de double cliquer sur le fichier “rampa dico”, d’aller dans “my web sites” (un répertoire superflu créé par mon logiciel aspirateur de sites), puis une fois dans “my web sites” de double cliquer sur “index.html” ce qui chargera la page d’introduction du rampa-dico dans votre navigateur web et vous donnera accès au reste du rampa-dico en cliquant sur les liens contenus dans la page d’introduction.
full aaron russo interview by alex jones concerning nick rockefeller
•2 March, 2009 • 2 Comments
“Hollywood director Russo goes in-depth for first time on the astounding admissions of Nick Rockefeller, including his prediction of 9/11 and the war on terror hoax, the Rockefeller’s creation of women’s lib, and the elite’s ultimate plan for world population reduction and a microchipped society. Aaron Russo joins Alex Jones for a fascinating sit-down in depth video interview on a plethora of important subjects.
Aaron begins by describing how the draconian and mafia tactics of Chicago police woke him up to the fact that America wasn’t free after his nightclub was routinely raided and he was forced to pay protection money.
Aaron and Alex then cover a broad range of topics including the private run for profit federal reserve, Aaron’s experience in the late 80’s with the IRS when they retroactively passed laws to punish silver and gold traders, the real meaning of the word “democracy,” what really happened on 9/11 and Aaron’s relationship with Nick Rockefeller, who personally tried to recruit him on behalf of the CFR.
Aaron also relates how Rockefeller told him that the elite created women’s liberation to destroy the family and how they want to ultimately microchip and control the entire population. Rockefeller also told before 9/11 Russo that an unexpected “event” would catalyze the U.S. to invade Afghanistan and Iraq.”
original google video
False Fact On Wikipedia Proves Itself (trad. fr.)
•11 February, 2009 • Leave a Commenttrad. fr. en bas.
False Fact On Wikipedia Proves Itself
Germany has a new minister of economic affairs. Mr. von und zu Guttenberg is descended from an old and noble lineage, so his official name is very long: Karl Theodor Maria Nikolaus Johann Jacob Philipp Franz Joseph Sylvester Freiherr von und zu Guttenberg.
When first there were rumors that he would be appointed to the post, someone changed his Wikipedia entry and added the name ‘Wilhelm,’ so Wikipedia stated his full name as: “Karl Theodor Maria Nikolaus Johann Jacob Philipp Wilhelm Franz Joseph Sylvester Freiherr von und zu Guttenberg.”
What resulted from this edit points up a big problem for our information society. (in German; Google translation)
The German and international press picked up the wrong name from Wikipedia — including well-known newspapers, Internet sites, and TV news such as spiegel.de, Bild, heute.de, TAZ, or Süddeutsche Zeitung. In the meantime, the change on Wikipedia was reverted, with a request for proof of the name. The proof was quickly found.
On spiegel.de an article cites Mr. von und zu Guttenberg using his ‘full name’; however, while the quote might have been real, the full name seems to have been looked up on Wikipedia while the false edit was in place.
So the circle was closed: Wikipedia states a false fact, a reputable media outlet copies the false fact, and this outlet is then used as the source to prove the false fact to Wikipedia.”
traduction-résumé en français :
quelqu’un rajoute un prénom au ministre des affaires économiques allemand sur sa page wikipedia.
la presse allemande et internationale prend ce faux nom sur wikipedia et le publie comme vrai.
pendant ce temps, l’édition de l’article wikipedia contenant le faux prénom a été annulée, agrémentée d’une demande de preuves. La preuve a été vite trouvée.
Sur spiegel.de (le Spiegel est un des plus gros journaux allemands, un peu comme Le Monde en france) un article cite le ministre en utilisant son “nom complet”.
Bien que la citation était réelle et venant d’une source fiable (ce qui est le critère de vérité sur wikipedia), ce “nom complet” semble avoir été trouvé sur wikipedia pendant que l’édition incorrecte de l’article était en place.
Donc la boucle est bouclée. Wikipedia fait une fausse déclaration, un media respecté recopie le pseudo fait, et ce media est alors utilisé comme source pour prouver la fausse déclaration de wikipedia.
Orwell… pour ceux qui ça intéresse, ça fait longtemps que wikipedia est dans le collimateur des activistes de la défense des libertés individuelles.
un exemple en anglais : wikipedia watch.
requiem pour nos abeilles
•10 February, 2009 • Leave a CommentMutinerie dans les ruches
Les abeilles transhument vers le néant. Les abeilles désertent par dizaines de milliards. Les ruches se vident en moins d’une semaine. C’est une nouvelle catastrophe pour le monde apicole (et sans doute pour le monde entier) car celle-ci s’annonce d’amplitude planétaire. Elle se nomme “syndrome d’effondrement des colonies”.
Aux USA, les experts apicoles sont en plein désarroi. Ils évoquent même un “mystère”. En effet, les abeilles disparaissent “proprement” sans laisser de cadavres. Les ruches pleines de miel et de pollen ne sont pas pillées par d’autres abeilles ou d’autres insectes. C’est une malédiction qui plane sur les ruchers.
Les experts apicoles ne désespèrent pas, cependant, de trouver le remède miracle, de sauver, encore une fois, leur “industrie”, puisque c’est ainsi qu’ils la qualifient. Ils ont mis sur la trace des abeilles portées disparues les meilleurs détectives-virologues. L’enjeu est de taille: pas d’abeilles, pas de pollinisation, pas de récoltes, pas de dollars. Le bipède, qui s’est autoproclamé maître de la sphère planétaire, en est tout courroucé. Les abeilles font la grève de la pollinisation, les mutines refusent la butine.
Les abeilles n’éprouveraient-elles donc aucune reconnaissance pour cette “industrie apicole” qui les a choyées depuis des dizaines d’années en leur prodiguant:
- le logis: avec de belles ruches toute carrées.
- les meilleurs remèdes: les antibiotiques les plus puissants (comme la terramycine ) et les acaricides les plus performants ( Apistan et le tout nouveau Hivastan).
- de la nourriture à satiété: du bon sucre blanc de betterave, du sirop de maïs confectionné à partir des meilleurs crûs transgéniques et bien sûr, des compléments nutritionnels (élaborés, par exemple aux USA, à partir d’huile de coton transgénique, de farine de soja transgénique, d’huile de soja transgénique, d’huile de colza transgénique…).
- des voyages tous frais payés sur des milliers de kilomètres à la découverte des déserts agricoles occidentaux.
- un butin assuré grâce à des monocultures géantes à la porte de la ruche.
- du pollen et du nectar enrichi d’un cocktail de molécules apéritives: fongicides, insecticides, herbicides.
- de la procréation assistée avec une sélection des meilleures reines inséminées artificiellement.
Une catastrophe bientôt planétaire (…)
**
lire la suite
télécharger tout l’article en format .pdf hébergé sur le site d’origine ou sur ce blog.
rachida la femme noire de sarkozy
•29 January, 2009 • 16 Comments
aaaah ça y est
je vois pourquoi la grossesse de rachida est si symbolique
parce qu’elle équilibre sa relation avec sarko
sarko qui vole les femmes des autres (cécilia)
qui divorce en plein mandat
qui se marie avec une “pute” (carla)
et pof rachida a un enfant de père inconnu
fatalement le lien avec sarko est symbolique, à défaut de biologique.
comme rachida et sarko ne peuvent pas être officiellement en couple (le
“juif” avec l’”arabe”, ça passe pas)
reste l’officieux…. et boum rachida a un enfant toute seule
putain j’ai mis le temps à comprendre
l’enfant de rachida est donc le mouton noir de la république de sarkozy,
son fruit défendu
son antéchrist;)
notez que carla ne fait pas mine de procréer…
tout concorde
le symbole est complet
rachida est la vraie femme de sarko (symboliquement dans l’inconscient)
leur crise de rupture actuelle fait bien plus de bruit que quoique ce
soit qui vienne de carla
.
.
Edit du 16 mars :
Carla a déclaré souhaiter un enfant. Est ce que ça infirme ma théorie? Pas vraiment.
Ca peut aussi la confirmer : cette déclaration n’arrive qu’après que la rupture entre rachida et sarkozy soit consommée. Rupture professionnelle bien sûr, mais également affective… jusqu’à quel point leur relation affective était-elle forte?
Et rappelez-vous cette phrase qu’aurait eue carla un jour où rachida était invitée dans ses appartements de l’Elysée, en passant devant le lit conjugal elle aurait dit à rachida : Tu aurais bien aimé l’occuper.
Finalement pour sarko, rachida est son alter-ego : une gagneuse fille d’immigrés prète à tout pour réussir, alors que carla est son rêve : une aristocrate italienne.
Rachida c’est son passé, sa nature dont il veut s’éloigner mais dont il ne peut pas se séparer.
Carla c’est son aspiration, ce qu’il désire être et devenir, son idéal : fric, pouvoir, beauté et aristocratie, carla est fille de grands industriels (richissime famille) bref les “copains” habituels de sarko ou plutôt ses employeurs.
Qu’est-ce qui fait souffrir Rachida?
Pourquoi n’a-t-elle pas droit à une vie de famille complète?
credo mutwa on barack obama
•12 January, 2009 • 4 CommentsAn actor walks upon the floodlit stage of life
wearing a mask of an angel beneath a demon’s gown.
Pretence smiles upon the crowded hall of life
holding out hope as bright as it is false.
Son of a woman in whose veins flows the blood
of ancient Ireland and dark Africa’s plains.
You are Obama, nick-named the standing king
You are Barack, oh, son born to deceive
The suffering hoards of Africa look up to you,
See a black saviour where nought but a Judas strides.
An entrapper of nations, bringer of dismal war
Behind the robes and the nylon wings of hope
Oh, may those who look upon you, see you as you are.
May those who hope in you behold you as you be
A prince deceitful to bring down Africa’s shrines
A siren who leads Africa’s ships onto rocks of obliteration.
Your rule my lord will not be one of peace
Your reign my king will not be one of smiles
Even as we speak in caves both dark and dank
Enraged fanatics plot your dark demise
They will put around your head a bloodwet martyr’s crown.
Oh black Kennedy following the one before
May God forgive thee and thy fiery spouse
As you walk in silence from the stage of life
Barack Obama, blessed son, Oh standing king.
Found here
Barack Obama: The Naked Emperor, By David Icke
•11 January, 2009 • 9 CommentsI stole this whole page from david icke’s website. I guess he won’t mind.
Barack Obama: The Naked Emperor

PLEASE CIRCULATE AS WIDELY AS POSSIBLE. THE LINK TO SEND PEOPLE IS:
I am writing this in the last days of 2008 as I watch with dismay as vast numbers of people across the world, including many who should know better, have been duped by the mind-game called Operation Obama. Even people with some understanding of the conspiracy have said things like: ‘Well, at least he’s not Bush’ and ‘Well, at least it’s great to see such a new spirit of hope’. No, he’s not Bush – he’s potentially far more dangerous; and what is the use of a spirit of ‘hope’ if it’s based on a lie? In fact, what use is ‘hope’ at all? Obama’s wife, Michelle, who I wouldn’t trust to tell me the date in a calendar factory, said that ‘everything begins and ends with hope’. Utter nonsense. Hope is a meaningless emotion because its fruits are always in the future and, by definition, never in the NOW. Hope is like riding a carousel horse; no matter how fast you go you never get closer to the one in front. The idea, however, is to persuade you to stay on the horse, despite the evitable disappointment, in the ‘hope’ that things will change. But they don’t because the very system is designed to prevent it.


That’s the way ‘hope’ is employed by the dastardly and devious – take the crap we are giving you now in the ‘hope’ that things will get better (but we know they won’t). Barack Obama is a purveyor of ‘hope’ because his masters want the people to accept what they are given now in the hope that good times will come. Just do what we demand, oops, sorry, Barack demands, and in return he’ll inspire you to hope that it is all leading to the Promised Land. It isn’t, but, by the time you realise that, it’s too late. What terrifies the manipulators is that people will abandon hope, as a future, sometime-never projection, and start to demand fairness, justice and freedom now. To avoid this nightmare they need to keep those desires as something to aspire to, not to actually have. Thus, their man, Obama, sells ‘hope’ as a diversion technique, a holding position, to keep the masses from truly rebelling. We have no job, no food on the table and our home has been foreclosed, but at least we have ‘hope’. Phew, thank goodness for that. ‘I’m hungry, mum, can I have some hope, please?’ ‘I’m so sorry, darling, you can’t have hope today, only tomorrow – hope is always tomorrow.’ ‘So will I eat tomorrow, mum?’ ‘We can hope so now, dear, but when we get to tomorrow, we can only hope it’s the next day.’ On and on it goes. That’s how ‘hope’ works. Or rather doesn’t. Obama’s predominant mantra has been ‘change’. Indeed, his massively-funded, record-breaking campaign was based on that one word – change. This is a technique used by Bill Clinton and many others and it is highly effective because, at any point, the system ensures that most people are not happy with the way life is. So, when you don’t like the status quo, ‘change’ can be a potent message, even if, like Obama, you don’t say what it means. It has been vital to his success, and that of his controllers, that he has never specified what his ‘hope’, ‘change’, and that other mind-control trigger-word, ‘believe’, were referring to in terms of policy and the way society in general will be affected. Hope for what? Change what? Believe in what? To answer those questions with specifics would have been fatal to Obama’s appeal.

I studied the military/government mind-control programmes and techniques in great detail for many years during the late-1990s and across 2000, and the Obama ‘phenomenon’ is the most blatant mass-mind control operation you could wish to see. At its core the plan has been to make Obama the focus of everything you hope for, believe in and want to change. This is why it has been crucial for him not to specify and detail what is meant by his ‘hope, ‘change’ and ‘believe’. However, I can tell you what those words mean in the context of the Obama mind-game. They mean whatever you decide they mean or want them to mean. The idea is for you to project all that you stand for onto him and so he becomes the symbol of you and how you see the world. Specifics would destroy that ‘I am whatever you want me to be’ scenario and so you don’t get any detail, just ‘hope’, ‘change’, and ‘believe’. They don’t want him to be seen only as ‘the Messiah’; they also want him to be Abraham Lincoln, JFK, or Buddha – anyone you choose to project on him, for he is a blank page, blank screen and empty suit. Obama is a make-your-own, do-it-yourself leader, a projection of your own mind. (If you are still asleep, that is. If you are in any way awake, he’s an open book.) See the video How Obama Got Elected to see how easy it is to manipulate the masses. It’s child’s play. Click here …



‘I am whatever you want me to be, for I am just a projection of you. And I got a big smile, see.’
There is no more powerful way of manipulating people than to tell them what they want to hear and to keep shtum about anything they wouldn’t like. Double-glazing salesmen are trained to pick up in general conversation what their target likes and dislikes and to respond accordingly in the way the product is sold. The technique is simply to tell the potential buyer what you have gleaned they want to be told. Obama comes from the same stable, but on a massively bigger scale and with a whole network of advisors and controllers steeped in the art of manipulating minds, opinions and actions. Obama’s written-for-him speeches are not from the heart, but from the autocue. The ‘heart’ bit comes from extensive training and his Bill Clintonesque ability to ‘mean it when he says it’, a state of delivery that goes beyond mere acting. Tony Blair was trained in the same way. But if you take a step back and look at these people dispassionately you can clearly see the techniques they consciously employ. Blair is the most blatant fraud in the way he delivers a line, stops in mid-sentence for emphasis and looks down for fake emotional effect. Obama is a little more slick, but, from where I have been looking this past year, not much. And how have people not seen those cold eyes just above the painted smile? You can watch his mind working, turning between autocue screens to his left and right, then straight down the camera for his key messages. From-the-heart orators don’t do that; they are too immersed in what they are feeling and saying to give even a passing thought to where they are looking or how the line is delivered. I worked in television for more than a decade, often reading autocue while a director spoke in my ear telling me what cameras to look at. I have, since the early 1990s, spoken my truth on public stages across the world. I know, therefore, the difference between artificial autocue delivery and body language and talking from the heart without a script. Obama, I repeat, is coming from the autocue, not the heart.

Obama’s speeches are a mass of mind-control techniques and Neuro-Linguistic-Programming, or NLP, and they are carefully constructed to implant beliefs and perceptions into the mind of the viewer. Click here for a description of his psycho-babble, headed An Examination of Obama’s Use of Hidden Hypnosis Techniques in His Speeches. As I keep emphasising, the whole Obama circus is an exercise in mass mind control and it has been so successful because so many people live their lives in a permanent state of trance. All of which brings me to the parallels with Nazi Germany, fascist Italy and similar regimes throughout history. Obama may not look like Hitler, nor sound like Hitler, but the themes are just the same. Germany was in a terrible state economically and militarily in the 1930s in the aftermath of the First World War and the reparations inflicted on the country by the Rothschild/Illuminati-controlled Versailles ‘Peace’ Conference in 1919. From amid the chaos came the man that Germans saw then in much the same way that so many see Obama today. His name was Adolf Hitler and his oratory and rhetoric, again supported by a ritualistic presentation founded on mind-control techniques, made him appear to be the German ‘messiah’, the German Obama. Hitler promised ‘change’, ‘hope’ and something to ‘believe in’ amidst the consequences of war and financial collapse. He spoke to vast rallies of adoring followers and a mass movement emerged in support of Hitler’s vision of a new tomorrow. As the writer Webster Tarpley points out, fascism in its true sense is not just a Police State imposed by a tiny hierarchy. It might end up like that, but first it is brought to power by a mass movement from within the people who have no understanding of what the ‘change’, hope’ and ‘believe’ they are being offered really means. They just know that they want some because, as with Obama, they make it mean what they want it to mean. Only later do they see, to their horror, what they have signed up for.

Obama’s America …

… Hitler’s Germany.
There may seem to be a world of difference, but the techniques are just the same.
Obama is far more dangerous than Bush because he can sell a line to those who are in the trance while Boy Bush could not do that on anything like the same scale. Bush was a transparent idiot with no communication skills who needed massive fraud at the polls to get him officially ‘elected’. He could never be the figurehead to inspire a mass movement of the people to support some vacuous ‘hope’, ‘change’ and ‘believe’ when they don’t even know what those words are supposed to mean. But Obama clearly can, because he has. One of ‘his’ (his controllers’) prime targets are the young, just as they were with the Nazis and the Hitler Youth Movement. If you think this parallel is far-fetched then have a look at this video to see how extreme Obama worship has already become for some young people. Hitler Youth was just the same. Click here to watch … In line with this theme, the WorldNetDaily website reported: ‘The official website of President-Elect Barack Obama, Change.gov, originally announced that Obama would “require” all middle school through college students to participate in community service programs; but after a flurry of blogs protested children being drafted into Obama’s proposed youth corps, the website’s wording was softened. Originally, under the tab “America Serves”, Change.gov read, “President-Elect Obama will expand national service programs like AmeriCorps and Peace Corps and will create a new Classroom Corps to help teachers in under served schools, as well as a new Health Corps, Clean Energy Corps, and Veterans Corps. “Obama will call on citizens of all ages to serve America, by developing a plan to require 50 hours of community service in middle school and high school and 100 hours of community service in college every year,” the site announced.’ For the full story, click here …

Obama said in a speech in July 2008 in Colorado Springs that he wanted to see a ‘civilian national security force’ that would be as powerful and well-funded as the Marines, Navy and Air Force. As Joseph Farah, founder of WorldNetDaily, wrote: ‘If we’re going to create some kind of national police force as big, powerful and well funded as our combined U.S. military forces, isn’t this rather a big deal? I thought Democrats generally believed the U.S. spent too much on the military. How is it possible their candidate is seeking to create some kind of massive but secret national police force that will be even bigger than the Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force put together? Is Obama serious about creating some kind of domestic security force bigger and more expensive than that? If not, why did he say it? What did he mean?’ Obama meant, amid the flowery words, that he’s not in favour of either peace or freedom. He is a front-man demagogue for the same force that controlled Boy Bush, Clinton, Father Bush, Reagan, Carter, ad infinitum; but the difference is that he has been hyped to such hysterical proportions that he will be allowed to get away with far more than they were, at least until reality dawns on the mass ranks of his hypnotised supporters. And, clearly, that could take some time. The cabal will be anxious to squeeze every minute from Obama’s honeymoon period and we can expect to see events move quickly after his inauguration in January.


When I was a journalist 30 years ago, I came across a technique that some tabloid newspaper reporters would use to get someone to speak with them. They would work in pairs with the first one knocking on the door of some distressed family who didn’t want to talk with the media. He would tell them he was from a newspaper he didn’t really work for and treat them with aggression and contempt to make them even more upset. He would then leave and his colleague would knock on the door, tell them the real newspaper he was from, and act like Mr. Nice Guy. He would say that he understood completely how upsetting the other man must have been, but ‘if you will only speak to me exclusively I will make sure that the other man, nor anyone like him, won’t bother you again’. They usually agreed and the scam was complete. Much the same thing is happening with regard to Bush and Obama. The Neoconservative ‘Republican’ wing of the Illuminati controlled Bush for eight years and led the country into foreign wars and financial chaos (bad guy/problem); now the ‘Democratic’ wing, led by the infamous Zbigniew Brzezinski, has brought forth the ’saviour’, Barack Obama, to lead us into the sunshine with ‘hope’ and ‘change’ (good guy/solution). Hence even some more aware people say: ‘At least he’s not Bush’. Apart from the unspecified ‘hope, ‘change’ and ‘believe’, few have any idea what Obama’s policies will be. Public perception comes from having an ‘image’ of him, or a self-projection, not the fine print because Obama doesn’t do fine print until the votes are cast and even then he will hide it in his windbag words. There is an ‘image’ that Obama is against war, but no he’s not. He says he’s against the invasion of Iraq, though we’ll see what he does about that in office. How can a man calling for more troops, including European troops, to be sent to Afghanistan be against war? He has also said he is prepared to bomb Pakistan and use military force to stop Iran building nuclear weapons and he has appointed Hillary ‘Let’s bomb ‘em’ Clinton (Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations) as Secretary of State and re-appointed Bush’s ‘Let’s bomb ‘em’ Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates (Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations). So that’s the ‘change we can believe in’, then. Obama isn’t against war at all and, if his controllers have their way, he will engage the US in even more foreign conflicts with the troops sent to their deaths, and the deaths of their targets, on a wave of oratory from the dark suit with the black face who would never go where he’s sending them.

He claims to be a ‘uniter’, which is exactly what Bush said about himself before he came to office, but unity in and of itself is not the issue. Nazi Germany had unity in the early years of the war, but was that a good thing? What matters is what the unity is designed to achieve and Obama’s much-vaunted ‘unity’ is to ‘inspire’ a mass movement to support the Orwellian plans of the Illuminati. His constant rhetoric about ‘bringing people together’ can be used to justify the ‘coming together’ of the United States, Canada and Mexico in the North American Union; it can be used to concede America’s sovereignty to the ‘coming together’ of the ‘world community’ (world dictatorship); it can be used to unite the believers in their opposition and condemnation of non-believers, which is precisely what happened in Nazi Germany with the book-burning and violent suppression of those who challenged the Hitler regime. The potential of Obama Mania is endless when it comes to selling fascism as ‘hope, change’, ‘freedom’ and a ‘New America’, or ‘New World’ [Order]. Bush and Cheney were transparent warmongers and would always have struggled to bring in the draft, the compulsory enlistment of people into the military against their will. But it would not be as difficult for Obama in the current climate. For goodness sake, he’s already talking about compulsory community service for middle school, high school and college students and creating a peoples’ army in America. That’s why I say Obama is far more dangerous to freedom than Bush. In the last eight years Bush could only get part of the way to fascism – Obama has the potential to finish the job, for all the reasons I have mentioned and more.

You only have to look at the cabal behind Obama, and those he has already appointed to his administration team, to see what his ‘change’ is truly planned to be. His mentor, svengali and main controller is Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter’s National Security Advisor, and the co-founder, with David Rockefeller, of the Illuminati’s Trilateral Commission. Brzezinski has admitted publicly that he began to fund and train what he would call today ‘terrorists’ in Afghanistan to oppose the Soviet-controlled government in the capital, Kabul, in the late 1970s. The idea, he said, was to entice the Soviet Union to invade Afghanistan to protect the Kabul regime and thus give the rival superpower ‘their Vietnam’. The plan worked at the cost of a million Afghan lives during the Soviet occupation from 1979 to 1989, a consequence that troubles Brzezinski not at all. Brzezinski’s ‘freedom fighters’ would become known as the ‘Mujahideen’ and later the Taliban and what is claimed to be ‘Al-Qaeda’. This is the man behind ‘anti-war’, Barack Obama. It was common knowledge that President Carter would do nothing involving foreign policy without the okay from Brzezinski, the co-founder of the Trilateral Commission which chose Carter for president. It is one of many great ironies of the Obama presidency that he is demanding massive troop reinforcements to be sent to Afghanistan to fight the Taliban terrorists who were initially armed, trained and organised by Brzezinski, the man behind Obama. As Morpheus says in The Matrix: ‘Fate, it seems, is not without its sense of irony’. But then, in Brzezinski’s case, it is not ‘fate’, but cold calculation that has brought it all about. The Poland-born Brzezinski has a fierce hatred of Russia and that is still one of his key targets, together with China. And if they are Brzezinski’s targets, they are Obama’s targets.

The Trilateral Commission and the wider Brzezinski network, including Illuminati fronts like the Ford Foundation, have now chosen Obama and the situation will be the same. Brzezinski will call the shots; Obama’s job is simply to sell them to the people. This is rather alarming when you think that Brzezinski wants to trigger a war involving Russia and China. ‘Obama’s’ policies come straight from Brzezinski’s books. Here is one Brzezinski quote you might recognise and it was made before Obama ran for president: ‘Needed social reassessment … can be encouraged by deliberate civic education that stresses the notion of service to a higher cause than oneself. As some have occasionally urged, a major step in that direction would be the adoption of an obligatory period of national service for every young adult, perhaps involving a variety of congressionally approved domestic or foreign good works.’ Now where have I heard that before?

As an Illuminati operative, Brzezinski’s aim is to create a world government, central bank, currency and army – a global dictatorship – underpinned by a microchipped population connected to a global computer/satellite system. He wrote a book in 1970, Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era, in which he described the global society that he and the Illuminati seek to impose: ‘The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.’ He also said in the same book nearly 40 years ago: ‘Today we are again witnessing the emergence of transnational elites … [Whose] ties cut across national boundaries … It is likely that before long the social elites of most of the more advanced countries will be highly internationalist or globalist in spirit and outlook … The nation-state is gradually yielding its sovereignty … Further progress will require greater American sacrifices. More intensive efforts to shape a new world monetary structure will have to be undertaken, with some consequent risk to the present relatively favorable American position.’ And what does his puppet, Obama, now say that Americans have to do to bring about ‘change’? ‘Make sacrifices‘. As Mrs. Demagogue, Michelle, said: ‘We need a different leadership because our souls are broken. We need to be inspired … to make the sacrifices that are needed to push us to a different place.’ You can bet that this will include sacrificing more sovereignty and freedom on the road to the global dictatorship described by Brzezinski for decades. Brzezinski’s son, Mark, was an ‘advisor’ to the Obama campaign (doing what his father told him) and, in line with the American one-party-state, his other son, Ian, was foreign policy advisor to the McCain campaign (doing what his father told him). His daughter, the Obama-supporting Mika Brzezinski, reported the campaign for MSNBC television. Obama has been the chosen one for a long time, a fact known only to a few in the deep inner circle, and his relationship with Brzezinski almost certainly goes back to the start of the 1980s when he attended the Ivy League, and big-time Illuminati, Columbia University where Brzezinski was head of the Institute for Communist Affairs. Obama simply will not talk in any detail about this period. He has been covertly funded and supported ever since by the Trilateral Commission and its network of foundations connecting into the Ford Foundation, for whom Obama’s mother worked. And a question: Does anyone really believe that someone, a ‘man of the people’, would simply appear from apparently nowhere to run the slickest and best-funded presidential campaign in American history? He was chosen long ago by those who wish to enslave the very people that Obama says he wants to ’set free’. The sources of Obama funding read like a Wall Street Who’s Who – Goldman Sachs, UBS, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, J.P. Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and so on. No wonder he went back on his pledge to accept the limitations of public funding for his campaign and instead took the no-limit option of ‘private’ funding. And those people are going to support a candidate who does not represent their best interests?? Oh please. Obama and his seasoned network of professional manipulators, sorry his ‘campaign team’, sold the lie that he had refused to take funding from ‘lobbyists’, those who are paid to ensure that politicians frame legislation, or block it, in the interests of their clients. But like everything that surrounds Obama, past and present, it’s a sleight of hand and mouth. They funnelled vast sums of money into the Obama accounts through law firms that represent lobbyists and lobby groups. It provided ‘plausible denial’ about funding from lobbyists while the money poured in from lobby interests via third parties.

Then there is the Jewish financier, George Soros, the multi-billionaire associate of Brzezinski and closely involved with the funding and marketing of Obama. Soros is a former board member of the Illuminati’s Council on Foreign Relations and funds the European Council on Foreign Relations. In short, he is a major insider. You can certainly see the Soros/Brzezinski techniques in the Obama ‘revolution’ in the United States. It was the complex and secretive network of Soros foundations and organisations, connected to the intelligence agencies of the US and Israel, that trained and funded students in the Ukraine, Georgia and elsewhere in the art of mass protest and overthrowing governments. These manufactured protests were sold to the world as ‘peoples’ revolutions’, but it just so happened that when they were over and the old regime was removed the new leaders were those waiting in the wings all along – the puppets of Soros, Brzezinski and their associated networks.

Obama is just more of the same, a big smile with strings attached, and controlled completely by the Illuminati networks that chose him, trained him, sold him and provided his record funding. It was they who kept his many skeletons under wraps, like the gay sex and crack cocaine allegations of Larry Sinclair, and they will continue to do so as long as he jumps to their bidding. Obama is just another Banksters’ moll prostituting himself for fame and power, and that’s why he supported the grotesque bail-out of the banking system and why he will always put their interests before the people. His financial advisors are straight from the Wall Street ‘A’ list, including Paul Adolph Volker (Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg Group), the head of the Federal Reserve from 1979 to 1987 and Illuminati to his fingertips. Obama has made him head of the Economic Recovery Advisory Board, which is dominated by insiders, including its staff director and chief economist, Austan Goolsbee, a close Obama associate from the University of Chicago. Goolsbee is an initiate of the infamous Illuminati Skull and Bones Society at Yale University, which also includes Boy and Father Bush. It was Goolsbee who told the Canadian government not to worry about Obama’s attacks on the economic effects of ‘free trade’ agreements because his words were just to win votes in the election campaign. Another Wall Street insider, the Zionist Timothy Geithner (Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations), was appointed by Obama to be his Treasury Secretary. Geithner was the President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, the most powerful in the private ‘Federal’ Reserve cartel that masquerades as America’s ‘central bank’, and he is a former employee of both the Council on Foreign Relations and the appalling Kissinger Associates. Obama’s Treasury team locks into the inner circle around the Zionist Robert Rubin, the Director and Senior Counselor of Citigroup, co-chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations, and economic advisor to Obama. Rubin, a member of the Illuminati Bilderberg Group, was the man behind Citigroup’s strategy of expanding its risk in debt markets which forced it to be rescued by taxpayers’ money. The very people who caused the financial crisis are being appointed by Obama to decide how to respond to it (more taxpayers’ money for them and their friends).

Rubin was Treasury Secretary to Bill Clinton and was followed in that post by Larry Summers (Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations) – another insider appointed to Obama’s team of ‘change’. Summers is a fanatical supporter of ‘free trade’ (freedom to exploit) and ‘globalisation’ (global dictatorship) and he wrote a memo in 1991, while chief economist to the World Bank, saying that the bank should dump toxic waste in poor countries because the costs of the ensuing ill-health and death would be lower. When the memo was made public, Brazil’s then-Secretary of the Environment, Jose Lutzenburger, told Summers: ‘Your reasoning is perfectly logical but totally insane … Your thoughts [provide] a concrete example of the unbelievable alienation, reductionist thinking, social ruthlessness and the arrogant ignorance of many conventional ‘economists’ concerning the nature of the world we live in … If the World Bank keeps you as vice president it will lose all credibility. To me it would confirm what I often said …the best thing that could happen would be for the Bank to disappear.’ Lutzenburger was dismissed shortly after writing this letter while the horrific Summers was made US Treasury Secretary by Bill Clinton and now he has been appointed to head the National Economic Council by Mr. ‘change’, hope’ and ‘believe’ Obama. It’s all a fairy story. Bloomberg.com reported that the Center for American Progress (CAP), housed just three blocks from the White House, has become a major source for policy initiatives for the Obama Democratic Party. Who funds the Center for American Progress? George Soros. It is simply the Neocon Project for the New American Century and the American Enterprise Institute under another name. Those two organisations developed and dictated the Bush policy of war and suppression of freedom and the ‘CAP’ and others like it will do the same for Obama. The CAP will fit and Obama will wear it. In fact, except in name and rhetoric, there is no difference in theme between the regimes of Bush and Obama. Bush policy was dictated through Illuminati ‘think tanks’ and so is Obama’s.

Bush was surrounded by slavish pursuers of Israeli interests and so is Obama. Mr. ‘Change’ has pledged his unquestioning support for Israel to the point of ‘pass the sick bag’ and his vice-president, Joe Biden (Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations), is a vehement Zionist who makes a virtue of saying he will support Israel in all circumstances. Obama has appointed the arch Zionist Rahm Emanuel as his chief of staff and another super Zionist Jew, Dennis Ross, to be his Middle East Policy advisor. God help the Palestinians. Ross also served in the Bill Clinton and Father George Bush administrations. Oh, plenty of ‘change’ there, then. Rahm Emanuel, a Chicago-born Congressman, is the son of Benjamin M. Emanuel, who was a member of the murderous Jewish terrorist organisation, Irgun, which helped to bomb and terrorise Israel into existence. The Open Secrets website reports that Emanuel was the top House recipient in 2008 for election contributions from ‘hedge funds, private equity firms and the larger securities/investment industry’. Emanuel was also appointed by Bill Clinton to the board of the mortgage giant Freddie Mac in 2000 and his tenure coincided with a stream of scandals and financial irregularities. It famously had to be bailed out by the taxpayer amid the sub-prime mortgage debacle. Emanuel, like Obama himself, is an asset of the ‘Illinois Combine’, a cross-party network of politicians and business interests that conspires to manipulate Chicago politics for their own benefit. Even before taking over at the White House Emanuel faced calls for his resignation for alleged connections with the Rod Blagojevich scandal.

In December 2008 Blagojevich, the Illinois governor and associate of Obama, was arrested over a conspiracy involving massive corruption and moves to sell Obama’s Senate seat in Chicago made vacant by his election to the presidency. It is yet another example of the staggering web on ongoing and infamous corruption in Chicago by the very networks that spawned Obama. A close friend of Rahm Emanuel is another clone of the Illinois Combine, the Zionist, David Axelrod, who ran Obama’s election campaign and will no doubt be highly influential in the Obama administration. Axelrod is a veteran of Chicago politics, one of the most corrupt political systems in the world and he worked for many Chicago mayors in the 1990s and on Obama’s senate campaign in 2004. Bill Clinton took his Arkansas cabal to Washington when he became president in 1993 and Obama is uploading his Chicago mob and handing them key positions of national power and influence. And these guys don’t take prisoners. All of this may be many things, none of them pleasant, but ‘change’ it isn’t.

David Axelrod, Obama’s ‘narrator’ and handler. Click here for a background article that needs some reading between the lines …
Obama is a monumental fraud who talks a good story, but lives a very different one. He won his first political office as a state senator in Chicago in 1996, not through the power of his policies, but by coldly abusing the electoral process. Instead of running against his opponents and letting the people decide, he had his cronies challenge hundreds of names on the nomination papers of his Democratic primary rivals until they were all forced off the ballot by technicalities. He then ran unopposed. One of them, Gha-is Askia, says that Obama’s behaviour belied his image as a champion of the little guy and crusader for voter rights: ‘Why say you’re for a new tomorrow, then do old-style Chicago politics to remove legitimate candidates? He talks about honour and democracy, but what honour is there in getting rid of every other candidate so you can run scot-free? Why not let the people decide?’ Why? Because he would probably have lost and Obama isn’t interested in losing by playing fair. He wants to win by any means necessary. The only voter-right he’s interested in is the right to vote for him. He has also used his hatchet-men like Axelrod to employ scandal to discredit opponents to ensure his election when the real scandal is the truth about Obama himself. He is a classically corrupt main-chancer spawned from the Chicago political cesspit. His close connections, therefore, to seriously dodgy ‘businessmen’ and fraudsters like the now-jailed slum landlord Tony Rezko are exactly what you would expect.

Rezko, yet another snout in the trough of the Illinois Combine, has heavily funded Obama’s political career and that of the now-arrested Rod Blagojevich, and in return they have supported massive sums being paid to Rezko by Chicago taxpayers to run ‘public housing’. These properties were then allowed to fall into such a state of danger and disrepair, including sewage running into kitchen sinks, that they were deemed unfit for habitation by the often black poor that Obama was supposed to be representing as a Senator. Some buildings were so bad they had to be demolished. Rezko also secured appointments for his business associates to state boards and was eventually indicted for using these connections to demand kickbacks from businesses that wanted to do business with the state. Rezko and Obama toured the $1.6 million mansion in Hyde Park, Chicago, which the Obamas bought at $300,000 below the asking price in 2005 while the Rezkos purchased the adjoining land at the full asking price. Some of this land was later bought by the Obamas. Rezko contributed a quarter of a million dollars to Obama’s political career and served on Obama’s Senate campaign finance committee, which raised more than $14 million. Then there is Obama’s close association with the terrorists, William Ayers and his wife Bernardine Dohrn. In the late sixties Ayers co-founded the terror organisation called the Weather Underground (also known as the Weathermen and similar derivatives) and launched a campaign of bombing public places like the Pentagon and the Capitol Building. Three members were killed making bombs in Greenwich Village. In 1970 Ayers was said to have described their philosophy as: ‘Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home, kill your parents, that’s where it’s really at …’ Mr. Ayers himself comes from the home of ‘rich people’. Bernardine Dohrn said this about the Charles Manson murders: ‘Dig it! Manson killed those pigs, then they ate dinner in the same room with them, then they shoved a fork into a victim’s stomach.”

William Ayers in 1968.
On the day of 9/11 he told the New York Times that he didn’t regret the Weather Underground bombing campaign and believed they didn’t do enough.
The case against Ayers and Dohrn was thrown out because of then illegal wire-taps and Ayers is now a professor in the College of Education at the University of Illinois at Chicago, holding the titles of Distinguished Professor of Education and Senior University Scholar. Ayers recruited Obama to serve as chairman on the $100 million Chicago Annenberg Challenge and they worked together for seven years handing out grants to the ‘educational’ projects of people like … William Ayers. They also worked together on another tax-exempt foundation, the Woods Fund in Chicago, which awarded grants to Obama’s own Trinity United Church, home to his controversial pastor, Jeremiah Wright. Obama’s political career was effectively launched in 1995, just after he was made chairman of the Annenberg Challenge, at a meeting at the Chicago home of … William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn. They have been connected to his circle ever since if the truth be told. The Chicago Annenberg Challenge, run by Obama and Ayers, didn’t fund schools directly, but instead insisted that they affiliate with ‘external partners’ who were granted the money. These turned out to be far-left ‘community organisers’ so beloved of Bill Ayers and these groups included the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (or Acorn). Obama also conducted ‘leadership training’ seminars with Acorn and its members began to become heavily involved in his political campaigns. It has also been behind efforts to ‘register voters’ (voters most likely to vote for Obama) and Nevada state officials raided Acorn’s Las Vegas office after election authorities accused the group of submitting multiple voter registrations with fake and duplicate names. Among the major funders of Acorn … George Soros. Obama even refuses to prove that he was born in the United States and thus qualifies to be President. He claims to have been born in Hawaii, but his grandmother, half-brother and half-sister in Kenya all insist he was born there.

‘Mr. Clean’ Obama has a deeply dirty background, but for now no scale of evidence will stop the swooning Obama zombies from believing the hype or burst their reality bubble. That is going to take hard experience and it could take some time and a lot of disappointment before they are released from the clutches of cognitive dissonance and have to admit to themselves they have been had. It is the same for all the black people who voted for what they thought was the first black president when, in truth, he is a man in a black mask representing the interests of the white-faced Illuminati cabal, the very families and networks that ran the slave trade. I don’t want to be the bringer of bad news or the thwarter of dreams, but honesty demands it. The man is a trickster controlled by supertricksters. A sock puppet controlled by bigger sock puppets who serve an even greater and darker evil. To his masters, Obama is just a means to an end and if it suits them to assassinate him to trigger civil war and upheaval in the United States then that is what they will do. Oh dear Oprah, how will you cope when reality dawns? But, then, will it ever??

‘What? You mean you’re not the Lord?’
I can understand the appeal of Obama because people want him to be what he claims to be, but isn’t. They are sick of the conflict, the corruption, the struggle we call ‘life’ and they want it all to change. But Obama’s change is illusory and represents only the continued transformation of society in the image envisaged by Orwell. We will see some apparently good things announced, like the closing of Guantanamo, to give the impression that Obama means what he says. But keep your eye on the ball and you’ll see how the agenda of the global tyranny is introduced under the guise of Obama’s ‘hope’, ‘change’, ‘believe’, ’sacrifice’ and ‘coming together’. It could take two years, maybe much more, before cognitive dissonance (lying to yourself) loses it current grip on the minds of the Obama faithful. Until then they will make endless excuses for him (lie to themselves) to keep the ‘dream’ alive. But one day they will have to admit, by the power of the evidence before them, that they bought a dream and got a nightmare. What a pity they can’t see the obvious now and save them themselves such painful disappointment.”
rémi le footeux
•22 December, 2008 • 4 Commentsle site de rémi gaillard : http://www.nimportequi.com/
Les CPE (Centres de la Petite Enfance) : politique familiale ou féministe?
•12 December, 2008 • Leave a Comment“Un enfant, une place”. C’est le slogan odieux du PQ [Parti Québécois] pour la présente campagne électorale. Pauline Marois, une travailleuse sociale recyclée en chef de parti, a en effet promis quelque 30 000 nouvelles “places” dans les garderies de l’État. Le PLQ [Parti Libéral du Québec], quoique moins zélé, suit simplement la vague en promettant à son tour des “nouvelles places”, tandis que l’ADQ [Action Démocratique du Québec], seule véritable altérité politique au Québec (ai-je besoin de préciser que Québec solidaire approuve l’intégrisme étatique des CPE ?), met un bémol “familial” à cette politique féministe en suggérant un soutien financier direct aux familles.
Il est difficile, dans l’espace publimédiatique, de jeter un éclairage sur la question des CPE, tant les termes du débat sont piégés d’avance. On ne peut rien discuter, en cette matière, si l’on ne convient pas d’emblée que les CPE n’ont pas été pensés en vertu des “familles”, mais des “femmes”. Je mets “femmes” entre guillemets, car la politique des CPE ne s’adresse qu’à un idéal-type féminin en particulier, la femme moderne et émancipée, qui ne peut se poser qu’en porte-à-faux d’une cellule familiale jugée aliénante par définition. La femme moderne et émancipée est une catégorie d’ensemble, qui contient en elle-même un large spectre typologique : elle désigne à la fois la célibataire hargneuse, militante de la fécondation in vitro ; la mère monoparentale récemment divorcée ; et la “conjointe contractuelle”, qui n’entretient, dans la “gestion” de sa “famille recomposée”, qu’un seul horizon : celui de l’efficacité managériale.
La catégorie de la femme moderne et émancipée, telle qu’élaborée par les ingénieurs de la propagande égalitariste, a pour but de dissocier la maternité de la famille, en même temps qu’elle rend la liberté de la femme conditionnelle à la dislocation de la cellule familiale. Pourquoi ? Parce que la dislocation de la cellule famille est nécessaire à l’épanouissement professionnel de la femme. Plus une famille est disloquée, ébranlée, recomposée, bricolée, négociée et “gérée”, plus il est possible pour la femme moderne et émancipée de s’ignorer comme mère et de se préférer comme femme moderne et émancipée. La manoeuvre, subtile, a des conséquences immenses.
(…)
Lire la suite ici
À LIRE ÉGALEMENT : “La force du féminisme, la faiblesse du Québec“, 7 juillet 2008 ; ”La nationalisation de l’enfance“, 29 février 2008 ; ”La Charte, ce joujou“, 13 février 2008 ; “La castration transversale“, 12 février 2008.
c’est ça l’islam
•12 December, 2008 • 18 Comments“Val-d’Oise. Jugée pour avoir tué son nouveau-né après un déni de grossesse.
Une jeune femme qui avait accouché dans ses toilettes, après un déni de grossesse, et a reconnu avoir tué son nouveau-né de peur d’être mise au ban de sa famille, est jugée demain et après-demain devant les assises du Val-d’Oise.
Âgée de 20 ans au moment des faits, la jeune femme célibataire, issue d’une famille musulmane pratiquante, comparaît libre pour meurtre sur mineur de moins de 15 ans. Elle encourt la réclusion criminelle à perpétuité.
Après avoir ressenti des maux de ventre le soir avant de se coucher, la jeune femme, dont personne ne savait qu’elle était enceinte, s’était rendue dans les toilettes de l’appartement familial où elle avait accouché en cachette. Ses frères, sœurs et parents étaient présents dans l’appartement de 60 m². « Lorsque je fais le film en arrière, j’ai voulu me convaincre et m’auto-convaincre que je n’étais pas enceinte », a affirmé l’accusée à un expert psychiatre.
Elle s’est alors rendue dans la cuisine pour jeter l’enfant par la fenêtre du 3e étage. La petite fille, née légèrement prématurée, a respiré au moins pendant quinze minutes, selon l’autopsie, entre le moment où elle est née et celui où elle a été retrouvée sans vie par des badauds. Interrogé par la police, le père de l’accusée a affirmé qu’il aurait « égorgé » sa fille s’il avait eu connaissance de sa grossesse.”
Source : LADEPECHE.fr
Le pire c’est que ce soit la fille qui passe au tribunal et risque la prison alors que ce sont les parents et la famille complice qui devraient être jugés. Mais à quoi bon condamner une famille qui ne fait que suivre les ordres de sa communauté religieuse qui est sa véritable nation ? Il s’agit d’un conflit entre nations, condamner des individus est largement improductif.
LA BATAILLE DE TCHERNOBYL – THE BATTLE OF CHERNOBYL – RUS
•8 December, 2008 • Leave a CommentDes dizaines de milliers de russes se sont sacrifiés pour éviter une SECONDE EXPLOSION qui aurait rendu l’Europe inhabitable pour des centaines de milliers d’années (VOIR LA TROISIEME PARTIE DU DOCU). Cette information fracassante a été révélée par ce documentaire de France 3 de 2006 mais est pourtant toujours passée sous silence.
Ce docu a plus de 2 ans, mais quel pourcentage de la population sait que l’Europe a faillie être rendue inhabitable en 1986? Encore aujourd’hui amusez-vous à en parler autour de vous, pour peu que vous tombiez sur un amateur de sciences il va vous nier que ce soit possible.
Des preuves?
jean-pierre petit a fait une page là dessus :
http://www.jp-petit.org/Presse/tchernobyl_mon_amour.htm
…où il cite la lettre du Professeur Nesterenko de Janvier 2005 :
“Si la masse en fusion perçait la dalle de béton sous le réacteur et pénétrait dans ces chambres de béton, il pouvait se créer des conditions favorables à une explosion atomique. Les 28-29 avril 1986 les collaborateurs du département de la physique des réacteurs de l’Institut de l’énergie atomique de l’Académie des sciences de Biélorussie ont fait des calculs qui montrèrent que 1300-1400 kg du mélange uranium+graphite+eau constituaient une masse critique et une explosion atomique d’une puissance de 3 à 5 Mégatonnes pouvait se produire (c’est une puissance 50 à 80 fois supérieure à la puissance de l’explosion d’Hiroshima). Une explosion d’une telle puissance pouvait provoquer des radiolésions massives des habitants dans un espace de 300-320 km de rayon (englobant la ville de Minsk) et toute l’Europe pouvait se trouver victime d’une forte contamination radioactive rendant la vie normale impossible.”
V. Nesterenko,
membre-correspondant de l’Académie des sciences du Belarus, professeur, docteur ès sciences techniques,
liquidateur des conséquences de l’accident survenu à la centrale atomique de Tchernobyl en 1986.
**
THE BATTLE OF CHERNOBYL (ENG) :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4vMTdSAm1w
THE BATTLE OF CHERNOBYL (RUS) :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yAy07rFH-s
the we inside of me
•4 December, 2008 • 3 CommentsJill Bolte Taylor : my stroke of insight
quand une neuro-anatomiste est victime d’un accident vasculaire cérébral.
vidéo sous titrée en français trouvée et mise à jour sur post-atheisme
voici l’original en anglais :
hellgate vs d3
•27 November, 2008 • Leave a CommentWhat i find weird is how everyone’s bashing HGL and ignoring everything its devs made so right.
Maybe it’s because I was lucky enough to avoid subscribing early (I only bought the game in september) therefore I wasn’t disappointed and of course I haven’t felt betrayed by whatever the flagship representatives (that is, Bill Roper i guess) said.
Anyway I understand the game could be way better but it’s only normal considering it was launched before being ready because of financial issues. There’s so much that feels oh-so-right when discovering this game, though :
- The guns and sci-fi setting : great. Diablo with guns, it’s great because it adds many possibilities and richness to the gameplay and items.
- The 3D subjective view : of course!!! That’s what had to be done for the next diablo, and in this respect hellgate IS the next diablo or an aborted project of it, moreso than the official diablo 3 ever will be IMHO. 3D subjective view means more fear, more immersion and more action! That’s what diablo is about.
- The skills : in the beginning I thought they were too simple, not enough developped, kind of a botched job. But that’s because I hadn’t played the game in depth yet. After having experienced them I realized that they are very well made and efficient gamewise and they have solved a few issues that diablo skills had, without killing the good sides.
Notably, damage-dealing skills do scale up and down in damage following your character’s level. This allows skills to have any level requirement, so a lvl 1 character can use a lvl 30 skill if he owns a weapon that has this skill… and it won’t be unbalanced because the damage of the skill will be scaled down to his character level. That’s very, very neat, something we wish we could have had in diablo 2.
- The stats : good job as well. Same as with skills, they added neat functionalities without losing any good sides of the diablo 2 model. It’s cleverly made, it adds to the gameplay and the fun, it doesn’t detract anything.
Same picture with the mods (hellgate’s runes and jewels). Why can’t anyone appreciate the good work made?
In these days when wow-makers are ruining the diablo franchise, I would wish for more recognition of the great job (albeit unfinished) that the flagship team did.
Ok I know, they screwed up in public relations, in business management and so on. I understand that for the ones who had high hopes and were flagshipped, the hate blinds them until now. But isn’t it time, now that the game is pretty much dead, to realize it did so many things right and will be the sole spiritual successor to diablo worth mentionning?
You just wait for D3’s release. I don’t need to wait, just reading the interviews and the news about the game is enough for me to realize it can’t be a genuine diablo game.
Hellgate gives me a real feel of what D3 should have been. D3 disgusts me to no end.
Of course I would play D3 and have fun… if I can stand the disgust about it being called “diablo” and ****ting on everything the diablo games are.
markosamo et les pouvoirs intérieurs de l’être humain
•24 November, 2008 • 2 Comments“Mais, cependant, déjà, au sein de cette civilisation extrême, se
glissait partout trop d’excessif raffinement, trop d’esthétisme, trop
de penchant pour l’artifice robotisé.
Le perfectionnement superficiel avait, depuis longtemps, empiété sur
la perfection intérieure de l’Homme, laissée en jachère.
Au profit d’une mentalisation aigüe, on oubliait de développer les
“pouvoirs” de l’Homme, ces pouvoirs que l’on dit “secrets” et qui,
seuls, pourtant lui sont naturels.
On intellectualisait intensément; on pensait avec le cerveau — la
frondaison de l’arbre — et on omettait de baigner les racines de ce
même arbre dans l’eau profonde et vivifiante du psychisme, à cet
endroit-charnière où se reflète dans l’Homme la donation cosmique…”
“Est-ce la fatigue de la journée, exarcerbée par le brouhaha et les
parfums? Markosamo se sent de nouveau dominé par la montée en lui du
Maha, dont la puissance à présent le recouvre.
A travers cet état d’être qu’il connait à peine et auquel il n’a pas
eu le temps de s’accoutumer, il regarde avec appréhension ce qui
l’entoure. Ses yeux sont dessillés. Il est incapable de se mentir à
lui même ni de se leurrer moindrement. Il voit. Et il souffre de ce
qu’il voit. Mais comment s’y dérober?
Alors, tandis que toutes les réalités cachées sous les apparences lui
agressent l’âme, il se souvient, comme par comparaison, de cette
antique ville de Kobor Tigan’t, dont son initiation lui a dévoilé ce
matin le passé fabuleux et, surtout, le sens. Il se souvient de
l’ennui larvé qui travaillait le corps et le coeur de ses habitants,
ses contemporains de ce temps-là.
Et il regarde ses contemporains d’à présent, si raffinés mais si
blasés en fait.
Il voit qu’ils ont tous perdu de leur cohésion vitale et de leur
unité. Il voit, cachées sous l’esthétique des extraordinaires
vètements et des maquillages, toutes les insatisfactions, les
perversités, les veuleries, les relâchements.
Un sanglot secret l’agite car il se dit : “Ce n’est pas possible
qu’ils soient ainsi ! ” Mais comment nier, puisqu’il voit!…
D’informes aspirations serpentent en eux. Toujours, ils sont dans
un tensif état de désirs et d’envies. A peine satisfaites, les
appétances renaissent. Ecoeurées de ce qu’elles viennent d’obtenir,
elles s’orientent vers autre chose, sans même se préoccuper d’abord de
savoir quelles sont ces autres choses ! C’est une course à l’illusion.
Les intelligences tournent à vide : l’âme, percluse, ne s’y infuse
plus. On n’en accepte pas les grands décrets. Ils sont mal portés. On
les trouve naïfs. Ils troubleraient la brillance des vastes
raisonnements spécieux dont on s’enivre. Les parties nobles du
cerveau, d’où émanent les pouvoirs créatifs de l’âme, les zones
sacrées de clairvoyance, de clairaudience, de télépathie, sont en
friche, au profit des seules parties du bavardage mental. Tout est
devenu palabre. Un immense, incommensurable bavardage !
Le Maha voudrait se boucher les oreilles. Tout est vain, tout est
faux, tout, ou presque, est déjà folie !…
— O Soleil de Connaissance, Pouvoirs innés de l’Homme, divin
héritage, d’abandonnez pas mon âme ! prie-t-il tout bas.
Car lui-même, il le constate, dans quelle coupable somnolence a-t-il
laissé gésir ses facultés supérieures ! Le réveil qu’a déclenché
l’initiation n’en est que plus douloureux.
Maintenant, il s’acharne à vouloir comprendre. Et il comprend
aussitôt. L’homme a quitté son centre, il s’est déplacé à l’extérieur.
Tout ce qui était en potentiel à l’intérieur de lui-même, le divin
matériel de maîtrise du monde et des éléments, le poste de commande,
il l’a délaissé. Il s’est inventé des artifices, des faux-semblants,
des additifs, des truchements mensongers et rapaces qui se nourrissent
de lui, qui le droguent et l’épuisent et qui, finalement, font mal ce
que l’homme révélé pourrait faire bien !
Lorsqu’il reprend ses esprits, Markosamo est effondré, ses mains sont
moites : il a compris que l’intense perfectionnement matériel, la
civilisation technique, si éblouissante, de l’Atlantide est, en
définitive, une erreur et qu’il faut, de toute urgence, commencer à la
rectifier, si on ne veut pas courir au devant de catastrophes
irrémédiables.
L’énormité de sa responsabilité le coiffe d’une chappe de plomb.
“Rectifier, c’est la tâche du Maha.”
—
Markosamo le Sage, Christia Sylf, éditions le Hiérarch.
Site des amis de Christia Sylf : http://www.christia-sylf.org



